What Space for Female Subjectivity in the Post-Secular?

Theory, Culture and Society 36 (7-8):173-192 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article heeds previous calls for revitalized feminist accounts of gender and religion. Having identified post-secular female pilgrimages as practices that actuate a ‘third space’, we claim that it is a space that cannot be adequately theorized from within secular feminist perspectives and attendant conceptions of subjectivity, agency and autonomy. Nor do perspectives from religious studies and its conceptions of piety as expressions of subjectivity, agency and autonomy do justice to the spatialities and subjectivities of post-secular female pilgrims. The article aligns itself with the budding field of critical feminist studies of post-secularism. We argue that, in general, both the protagonists and the detractors of post-secularism fail to recognize feminist theorizations of religion, the post-secular debate in feminist studies, and the place and role of women in the emergence of the post-secular. Whence, our neologism post-sexularism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Can We Afford to be “Post-Secular?”.Bill Cooke - 2013 - Essays in the Philosophy of Humanism 21 (1):93-103.
Living in an Age of Comfort: Understanding Religion in the Twenty-first Century.G. Melleuish - 2014 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 2014 (166):9-24.
Rethinking the Secular in Feminist Marriage Debates.Ada S. Jaarsma - 2010 - Studies in Social Justice 4 (1):47-66.
The „Pussy riot“ case and the post-secular hybrids.Dmitrij Uzlaner - 2013 - Filozofija I Društvo 24 (1):444-457.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-10-24

Downloads
14 (#965,243)

6 months
9 (#290,637)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind.John R. Searle - 1983 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Being and Time.Ronald W. Hepburn - 1964 - Philosophical Quarterly 14 (56):276.
In Spite of the Times.Rosi Braidotti - 2008 - Theory, Culture and Society 25 (6):1-24.

View all 14 references / Add more references