Should technological imperatives be obeyed?

International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4 (2):181 – 189 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Abstract This paper argues that both technological determinism (the development of technology is uniquely determined by internal laws) and technological voluntarism (technological change can be externally directed and regulated by the wants and free choice of human beings) are one?sided and partly mistaken. The determinists are right in the sense that technology has a power to influence our values and behaviour, and thereby appear to direct ?technological imperatives? to us. However, such commands are always conditional on some value premises; the voluntarists are thus right in pointing out that we need not obey such imperatives. The principle ?Can implies Ought? (all technological possibilities should be realized) is therefore invalid



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 79,971

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

30 (#404,974)

6 months
1 (#478,598)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ilkka Niiniluoto
University of Helsinki

Citations of this work

Philosophy of science in finland: 1970–1990. [REVIEW]Ilkka Niiniluoto - 1993 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 24 (1):147 - 167.

Add more citations