- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
On the Philosophy of Applied Social Sciences
In Hanne Andersen, Dennis Dieks, Wenceslao González, Thomas Uebel & Gregory Wheeler (eds.), New Challenges to Philosophy of Science. Springer Verlag. pp. 265--274 (2013)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Theoretical Procedures and Elder-Vass’s Critical Realist Ontology.Leonidas Tsilipakos - 2014 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 44 (6):0048393112461055.
Book Reviews : Insight and Social Betterment. A Preface to Applied Social Science. By James B. Rule. New York: Oxford University Press, 1978. Pp. 205. $13.95 (hardcover), $6.95 (paper. [REVIEW]Patrick Shaw - 1984 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 14 (2):273-275.
Philosophy of the social sciences: philosophical theory and scientific practice.Chrysostomos Mantzavinos (ed.) - 2009 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The scientific merit of the social sciences: implications for research and application.Zuyi Du - 2000 - Sterling, VA, USA: Trentham Books.
Social science as civic discourse: essays on the invention, legitimation, and uses of social theory.Richard Harvey Brown - 1989 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
The sociology of complex systems: An overview of actor-system-dynamics theory.Tom R. Burns - 2006 - World Futures 62 (6):411 – 440.
Do we need mechanisms in the social sciences?Julian Reiss - 2007 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37 (2):163-184.
Action and interpretation: studies in the philosophy of the social sciences.Christopher Hookway & Philip Pettit (eds.) - 1977 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
At Arm’s Length? Applied Social Science and its Sponsors.Heidi Kjærnet - 2010 - Journal of Academic Ethics 8 (3):161-169.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-28
Downloads
13 (#1,010,467)
6 months
2 (#1,232,442)
2014-01-28
Downloads
13 (#1,010,467)
6 months
2 (#1,232,442)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Revisiting the Basic/Applied Science Distinction: The Significance of Urgent Science for Science Funding Policy.Jamie Shaw - 2022 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 53 (4):477-499.
A Historical Perspective on the Distinction Between Basic and Applied Science.Nils Roll-Hansen - 2017 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 48 (4):535-551.
From the Characterization of ‘European Philosophy of Science’ to the Case of Philosophy of the Social Sciences.Wenceslao J. Gonzalez - 2015 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 29 (2):167-188.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-pp8v9 uwo