Novel facts and bayesianism

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 34 (4):375-379 (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/bjps/34.4.375

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Two dogmas of strong objective bayesianism.Prasanta S. Bandyopadhyay & Gordon Brittan - 2010 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (1):45 – 65.
Introduction: Bayesianism into the 21st Century.Jon Williamson & David Corfield - 2001 - In David Corfield & Jon Williamson (eds.), Foundations of Bayesianism. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 1--16.
Bayesianism I: Introduction and Arguments in Favor.Kenny Easwaran - 2011 - Philosophy Compass 6 (5):312-320.
Ramsey and the measurement of belief.Richard Bradley - 2001 - In David Corfield & Jon Williamson (eds.), Foundations of Bayesianism.
On not worshipping facts.J. R. Lucas - 1958 - Philosophical Quarterly 8 (31):144-156.
Bayesianism and support by novel facts.Colin Howson - 1984 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35 (3):245-251.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
120 (#144,908)

6 months
31 (#100,497)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ilkka Niiniluoto
University of Helsinki

Citations of this work

Truth-Seeking by Abduction.Ilkka Niiniluoto - 2018 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Bayesian Epistemology.William Talbott - 2006 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Fragmentation and Old Evidence.Will Fleisher - 2023 - Episteme 20 (3):542-567.
A Novel Solution to the Problem of Old Evidence.Jan Sprenger - 2015 - Philosophy of Science 82 (3):383-401.

View all 23 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes.Imre Lakatos - 1970 - In Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press. pp. 91-196.
Why did Einstein's programme supersede lorentz's? (I).Elie Zahar - 1973 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (2):95-123.
Why did Einstein's programme supersede lorentz's? (II).Elie Zahar - 1973 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (3):223-262.
Predicting novel facts.Michael R. Gardner - 1982 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 33 (1):1-15.

View all 9 references / Add more references