Dialogue and Universalism 21 (3):65 (2011)

Abstract
The editorial note recommending the book by Vladimir Kantor Russkaya Klasika Ili Bytiye Rassiyi communicates that the author (philosopher, novelist and historian) believes that only this culture is fully valuable whose most representative artists’ work turns into classics, thus gaining the status of high culture. It indicates the extent to which the great names of Russian literature write with an awareness that in order to make it into the classics canon of European literature, too, one needs to reckon with the previous work of Dante, Goethe, Schiller, Cervantes, Shakespeare, Hegel, Marx, Feuerbach, Nietzsche, and a number of other prominent representatives of the culture of the West. This is not to say that Pushkin, Goncharov, Tolstoy, Gogol or Dostoyevsky were imitators. By reproducing patterns or themes developed by the literature of the West, they set those in realities fundamentally different from the social realities of the West, often in a polemic vein. Kantor stresses that the great artistic ambitions or the Russian classics are accompanied by great social duties because they lived and created their artin a country that had been lagging behind for centuries. It did catch up at times, but it was successful only as of Czar Peter I, not without periodic regressive collapses, though. The sense of social obligations, characteristic of Russian writers, intellectuals, or intelligentsia, and to be more precise, the implementation of these obligations, enabled Kantor to prove that the progress of literature—the great classics in particular—was linked in Russia with civilizational progress, and that in terms of the weight of these links, Russia was very different in civilizational progress from Europe, which lay ahead civilization-wise
Keywords Continental Philosophy  Language and Literature  Social and Political Philosophy  Social Science
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1234-5792
DOI 10.5840/du201121315
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,257
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Crisis of the Tradition: Russian Conservative Thought from West to East.O. Shimanskaya - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 38:105-111.
Lev Gumilev: The Ideologist of the Soviet Empire.Dmitry Shlapentokh - 2012 - History of European Ideas 38 (3):483-492.
Russia and Europe: An Analysis of Ideas and Identity.I. B. Chubais - 2006 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 45 (2):69-91.
Book Review: Chechnya: Tombstone of Russian Power. [REVIEW]Rory J. Conces - 1998/99 - International Third World Studies Journal and Review 10:81-84.
Between East and West: Russian Renewal and the Future.Jurij Borodaj & Aleksandr Nikiforov - 1995 - Studies in East European Thought 47 (1-2):61 - 116.
Pëtr Chaadaev and the Rise of Modern Russian Philosophy.Janusz Dobieszewski - 2002 - Studies in East European Thought 54 (1-2):25-46.
Rethink Russian Philosophy Today.Vasiliy Gritsenko - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 8:101-107.
Religious Europe, Russia and Serbia: Past and Present.Mirko Blagojevic - 2008 - Filozofija I Društvo 19 (1):275-294.
The Role of the Russian Orthodox Church in Shaping the Political Culture of Russia.Marina Gaskova - 2004 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 3 (7):111-122.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-12-14

Total views
14 ( #729,270 of 2,499,746 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #72,971 of 2,499,746 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes