Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 6 (1-4):170 – 183 (1963)
AbstractFor a large and important range of cases the connection between ?X needs y? and ?X ought to have y?, though not an entailment, is still non?contingent. Sentences in which ?needs? occurs have several uses) one of which is normative; when such sentences are used to make statements, the statements constitute a good reason for asserting that what is needed ought to be done. It must, however, be recognized that such a reason may not be a sufficient reason for the moral appraisal that what is needed ought to be done. It is not self?contradictory to assert ?He needs it but he ought not to have it?, though in moral contexts if it is stated that someone needs something or that something is needed we are entitled to infer that, everything else being equal, he should have it or that it should be done. But often there are countervailing considerations which defeat that initial presumption. I attempt to support these contentions by 1) describing several key uses of ?need sentences? and 2) by elucidating the relations between the uses of such sentences and moral judgments
Similar books and articles
The Moral Truth.Mark Schroeder - forthcoming - In Michael Glanzberg (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Truth. Oxford University Press.
Moral Appraisals Affect Doing/Allowing Judgments.Fiery Cushman, Joshua Knobe & Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 2008 - Cognition 108 (2):353-380.
Varieties of Moral Emotional Experience.Hanah A. Chapman & Adam K. Anderson - 2011 - Emotion Review 3 (3):255-257.
Moral Sensibility,Visceral Representations,and Social Cohesion: A Behavioral Neuroscience Perspective.Jay Schulkin - 2005 - Mind and Matter 3 (1):31-56.
Appealing to Reason.Kai Nielsen - 1962 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 5 (1-4):65 – 84.
Moral Grammar and Intuitive Jurisprudence: A Formal Model of Unconscious Moral and Legal Knowledge.John Mikhail - 2009 - In B. H. Ross, D. M. Bartels, C. W. Bauman, L. J. Skitka & D. L. Medin (eds.), Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 50: Moral Judgment and Decision Making. Academic Press.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
Contextual Implication.Isabel C. Hungerland - 1960 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 3 (1-4):211 – 258.
Remarks on the Concept of Knowledge.Justus Hartnack - 1961 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 4 (1-4):270 – 273.