Theism and Ultimate Explanation – Timothy O'Connor

Philosophical Quarterly 60 (239):438-442 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is a book review of "Theism and Ultimate Explanation", by Timothy O'Connor

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/phiq.2010.60.issue-239

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Review of Timothy O'Connor, Theism and Ultimate Explanation: The Necessary Shape of Contingency. [REVIEW]Graham Oppy - 2008 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (6).
Theism and Ultimate Explanation.Timothy O’Connor - 2010 - Philosophia Christi 12 (2):265-272.
Theism and Ultimate Explanation: The Necessary Shape of Contingency, by Timothy O'Connor.R. C. Koons - 2009 - Mind 118 (471):862-867.
Timothy O’Connor on Contingency.William Lane Craig - 2010 - Philosophia Christi 12 (1):181-188.
Theism and Ultimate Explanation: The Necessary Shape of Contingency.Timothy O'Connor - 2008 - Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Timothy O'Connor theism and ultimate explanation: The necessary shape of contingency . (Oxford: Blackwell, 2008). Pp. XIII+177. £40.00 (hbk). Isbn 9781405169691. [REVIEW]T. J. Mawson - 2009 - Religious Studies 45 (2):237-241.
O'Connor's Cosmological Argument.Graham Oppy - 2011 - Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion: Vol. 3 3 (1):166.
The Shape of Causal Reality: A Naturalistic Adaptation of O’Connor’s Cosmological Argument.Graham Oppy - 2010 - Philosophia Christi 12 (2):281-288.
Ultimate naturalistic casual explanations.Graham Oppy - 2013 - In Ty Goldschmidt (ed.), Why is the something rather than nothing? Routledge. pp. 46-63.
Theism and Ultimate Explanation: The Necessary Shape of Contingency. [REVIEW]Peter Forrest - 2009 - Analysis 69 (3):589-591.
'Theism, Evil and the Onus of Proof – Reply to F. J. Fitzpatrick: DAVID O' CONNOR.David O' Connor - 1983 - Religious Studies 19 (2):241-247.
Theism and the Scope of Contingency.Timothy O'Connor - 2008 - Oxford Studies in the Philosophy of Religion 1:134-149.
Is God’s Necessity Necessary?Timothy O’Connor - 2010 - Philosophia Christi 12 (2):309 - 316.
The New Cosmological Argument: O’Connor on Ultimate Explanation.Tyron Craig Goldschmidt - 2011 - Philosophia 39 (2):267-288.
God and Inscrutable Evil: In Defense of Theism and Atheism.David O'Connor - 1997 - Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-03-04

Downloads
94 (#179,190)

6 months
5 (#629,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Samuel Newlands
University of Notre Dame

Citations of this work

Knowledge and availability.Alexander Dinges - 2018 - Philosophical Psychology 31 (4):554-573.
Cardinal Composition.Lisa Vogt & Jonas Werner - 2024 - Erkenntnis 89 (4):1457-1479.
A defence of experimental philosophy in aesthetics.Clotilde Torregrossa - 2020 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 63 (8):885-907.
Demandingness and Boundaries Between Persons.Edward Harcourt - 2018 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 26 (3):437-455.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references