Charlotte Newey
University of Reading
The punchy central claim of Torbjörn Tännsjö's book is that act-utilitarianism best explains our considered intuitions about the moral status of different kinds of killing. An interesting aspect of this book is Tännsjö's revisionary methodology, which he names 'Applied Ethics (Turned Upside Down)'. So, why does Tännsjö choose applied ethics (turned upside down) to argue for act-utilitarianism's role in explaining our considered intuitions about killing and what, exactly, is his innovative method of moral investigation?
Keywords Utilitarianism  Applied Ethics  Deontology  Liberal Rights Theory
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,578
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Applied Ethics. A Defence.Torbjörn Tännsjö - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (4):397-406.
Why No Compromise is Possible.Torbjörn Tännsjö - 2007 - Metaphilosophy 38 (2-3):330–343.
Utilitarianism Shot Down by Its Own Men?Tuija Takala - 2003 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 12 (4):447-454.
Why Should We Respect the Privacy of Donors of Biological Material?Torbjörn Tännsjö - 2011 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 14 (1):43-52.
Classical Hedonistic Utilitarianism.Torbjörn Tännsjö - 1996 - Philosophical Studies 81 (1):97 - 115.


Added to PP index

Total views
30 ( #369,784 of 65,535 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #298,909 of 65,535 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes