HYLE Book Review [Book Review]

Abstract

Referring to the Whig Party, the former political opponents of the Tories in Great Britain, British historian Herbert Butterfield once coined the term ‘Whiggish’ historiography for any account that looks at the past from the perspective of the present, as if the goal of the past were the achievement of the present. Thus, a ‘Whiggish’ history of science carefully ignores everything of the past that does not suit the idea of a steady growth of science towards the current state. Strangely enough, that approach has been prominent in philosophy too, from Hegel to recent philosophy science, so that we could equally speak of ‘Hegelian historiography’.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

On studying the past scientifically.Theodore Schatzki - 2006 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 49 (4):380 – 399.
The birth of the past.Zachary Sayre Schiffman - 2011 - Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Past minds : present historiography and cognitive science.Jesper Sorensen - 2011 - In Luther H. Martin & Jesper Sørensen (eds.), Past minds: studies in cognitive historiography. Oakville, CT: Equinox.
The Death of the Past.J. H. Plumb - 2004 - Palgrave-Macmillan.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
11 (#1,113,583)

6 months
3 (#1,002,413)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references