Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy 4 (1):198–213 (2016)

Authors
Turner C. Nevitt
University of San Diego
Abstract
Most contemporary interpreters of Aquinas think that he rejects the possibility of intermittent or “gappy” existence. Thus they think that the soul’s natural survival after death is a necessary part of Aquinas’s defense of the possibility of the resurrection. Yet this contemporary consensus rests on shaky foundations. For on the basis of a widely neglected quodlibet question, earlier interpreters of Aquinas as eminent as John Capreolus and Francis Sylvester Ferrara recognized that Aquinas reserves to God the power to annihilate material substances, including human beings, and then re-create them numerically the same. If these earlier interpreters are right, then the contemporary consensus is wrong. But Adam Wood argues that they are not right. He attempts to vindicate the contemporary consensus by offering an alternative reading of Aquinas’s quodlibet on annihilation and re-creation, providing textual evidence of Aquinas’s rejection of the possibility of “gappy” existence, criticizing the reading given to this evidence by Aquinas’s earlier interpreters, and mounting a philosophical case against the possibility of “gappy” existence based on his preferred interpretation of Aquinas’s theory of the principle of individuation. In this paper I come to the defense of Aquinas’s earlier interpreters. Wood’s alternative reading of Aquinas’s quodlibet is impossible to square with the text itself. Close inspection of Wood’s textual evidence shows that some of the readings of Aquinas’s earlier interpreters are much more plausible than Wood allows, making his textual case much weaker than he admits. And his philosophical case against the possibility of “gappy” existence begs the question.
Keywords Thomas Aquinas  Resurrection  Gappy Existence
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198786368.003.0009
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,257
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Mind the Gap?Adam Wood - 2015 - Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy 3 (1).
St. Thomas Aquinas on Gappy Existence.Patrick Toner - 2015 - Analytic Philosophy 56 (1):94-110.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Aquinas on the Death of Christ: A New Argument for Corruptionism.Turner C. Nevitt - 2016 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 90 (1):77-99.
Aquinas on Divine Simplicity.John Lamont - 1997 - The Monist 80 (4):521-538.
St. Thomas Aquinas on Gappy Existence.Patrick Toner - 2015 - Analytic Philosophy 56 (1):94-110.
Aquinas and the Question of God's Existence: Exploring the Five Ways.Damian Ilodigwe - forthcoming - International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 2018 (1).
Aquinas, Geach, and Existence.Damiano Costa - 2019 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 11 (3):175-195.
Aquinas, Resurrection, and Material Continuity.Silas Langley - 2001 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:135-147.
Aquinas, Resurrection, and Material Continuity.Silas Langley - 2001 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:135-147.
The Philosophical Theology of St. Thomas Aquinas.Eleonore Stump - 1993 - Review of Metaphysics 47 (1):141-143.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-10-22

Total views
9 ( #947,777 of 2,499,765 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,066 of 2,499,765 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes