On Detaching Hegel’s Social Philosophy from His Metaphysics

The Owl of Minerva 36 (1):31-42 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This paper rebuts four objections to my attempt, in Foundations of Hegel's Social Theory, to reconstruct Hegel's social philosophy in abstraction from his metaphysics and theodicy: 1) that social philosophy requires the Logic as its ground; 2) that only an independent metaphysics can justify the norms employed by social philosophy; 3) that empirical considerations can play no role in Hegel's arguments; and 4) that, robbed of his "ontology of the self," Hegel cannot respond to romantic critics. In response to a fifth objection, I acknowledge that my book fails to consider the extent to which art, religion, and philosophy are conditions of practical freedom.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 80,057

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Beyond the Pale.David Kolb - 2004 - The Owl of Minerva 36 (1):15-30.
Hegel's Standards of Political Legitimacy.Kenneth Westphal - 2002 - Jahrbuch für Recht Und Ethik/Annual Review of Law and Ethics 10:307-320.
Foundations of Hegel’s Social Theory. [REVIEW]Allen Speight - 2001 - The Owl of Minerva 33 (1):141-144.
Hegel's idea of freedom.Alan Patten - 1999 - New York: Oxford University Press.


Added to PP

64 (#197,352)

6 months
1 (#478,086)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Frederick Neuhouser
Columbia University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references