For the Discussion: Just Annotations, Not a Reply

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 6 (4):526-528 (1945)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Discussion: Reply to Hitchcock.Robert N. Brandon - 1997 - Biology and Philosophy 12 (4):531-538.
The Annotations of M. Valerivs Probvs.H. D. Jocelyn - 1984 - Classical Quarterly 34 (02):464-.
Discussion. Reply to Kovach.M. McGrath - 1997 - Mind 106 (423):581-586.
Annotations in Lewis and Short's Lexicon.W. R. Inge - 1894 - The Classical Review 8 (1-2):25-27.
Reply to Gale and Pruss.John F. Post - 2004 - Philo 7 (1):114-121.
Consciousness from a first-person perspective.Max Velmans - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (4):702-726.
Annotations to the Speech of the Muses (Plato Republic 546b-c).Michael Jacovides & Kathleen McNamee - 2003 - Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 144:31-50.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
19 (#781,160)

6 months
1 (#1,516,429)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references