For the Discussion: Just Annotations, Not a Reply

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,743

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
18 (#614,151)

6 months
1 (#386,989)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references

Similar books and articles

Discussion: Reply to Hitchcock.Robert N. Brandon - 1997 - Biology and Philosophy 12 (4):531-538.
The Annotations of M. Valerivs Probvs.H. D. Jocelyn - 1984 - Classical Quarterly 34 (02):464-.
Discussion. Reply to Kovach.M. McGrath - 1997 - Mind 106 (423):581-586.
Annotations in Lewis and Short's Lexicon.W. R. Inge - 1894 - The Classical Review 8 (1-2):25-27.
Reply to Gale and Pruss.John F. Post - 2004 - Philo 7 (1):114-121.
Consciousness From a First-Person Perspective.Max Velmans - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (4):702-726.
Propositions, Attitudes, and Russellian Annotations.Falkenberg Gabriel - 1994 - Journal of Semantics 11 (1-2):133-148.
Annotations to the Speech of the Muses (Plato Republic 546b-C).Michael Jacovides & Kathleen McNamee - 2003 - Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 144:31-50.