Guinevere’s choice

Human Nature 6 (2):145-163 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper examines four retellings of the Arthurian legend of Guinevere and Lancelot from a bio-evolutionary perspective. The historical and social conditions which provide contexts for the retellings are described, and those conditions are related to underlying male and female reproductive strategies. Since the authors of the selected texts, Chrétien de Troyes, Thomas Malory, Alfred Lord Tennyson, and William Morris, are all male, the assumption is made that these versions of the legend reflect male reproductive preoccupations and encode male attitudes toward femaleness in general and toward female adultery in particular

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mate choice in modern societies.Daniel Pérusse - 1994 - Human Nature 5 (3):255-278.
Male aggression against women.Barbara Smuts - 1992 - Human Nature 3 (1):1-44.
Male genital modification.Raven Rowanchilde - 1996 - Human Nature 7 (2):189-215.
Who dares, wins.Susan Kelly & R. I. M. Dunbar - 2001 - Human Nature 12 (2):89-105.
Mate Choice Copying in Humans.D. Waynforth - 2007 - Human Nature 18 (3):264-271.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
32 (#487,332)

6 months
8 (#342,364)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Verse form.John Constable - 1997 - Human Nature 8 (2):171-203.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Selfish Gene. [REVIEW]Gunther S. Stent & Richard Dawkins - 1977 - Hastings Center Report 7 (6):33.
Male aggression against women.Barbara Smuts - 1992 - Human Nature 3 (1):1-44.
Feminist theory, women's writing.Laurie Finke - 1992 - Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.

Add more references