What is the mole?

Foundations of Chemistry 15 (1):3-11 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The mole is a difficult concept. Surveys have shown that even many teachers do not have a proper understanding of it. To help to meet this problem, the SI/IUPAC formulation of the mole is carefully presented and explained. New SI proposals are also briefly discussed

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Butterfly, the Mole and the Sage.Robert Elliot Allinson - 2009 - Asian Philosophy 19 (3):213-223.
Quantitative parsimony.Daniel Nolan - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (3):329-343.
The mole and the locomotive.Daniel Bensaı¨D. - 2003 - Angelaki 8 (2):213-226.
Theoretical simplicity and defeasibility.Evan Fales - 1978 - Philosophy of Science 45 (2):273-288.
Attention.Christopher Mole - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The 'Mole' in Antiquity.D'Arcy Wentworth Thompson - 1918 - The Classical Review 32 (1-2):9-12.
Physical entropy and the senses.Kenneth H. Norwich - 2005 - Acta Biotheoretica 53 (3):167-180.
Style and the Mole: Domestic aesthetics in the wind in the willows.Seth Lerer - 2009 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 43 (2):pp. 51-63.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-03-09

Downloads
38 (#410,745)

6 months
9 (#295,075)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Atoms and Elements.David Knight - 1968 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 18 (4):352-353.

Add more references