Sophia 35 (2):1-12 (1996)
AbstractThe best judge of the soundness of a philosophical argument is the philosopher with the greatest philosophical aptitude, the deepest knowledge of the relevant subject matter, the most scrupulous character, and a disinterested position with respect to the subject matter. This last feature is important because even a highly intelligent and scrupulous judge may find it hard to reach the right conclusion about a subject in which he or she has a vested interest. When the subject of inquiry is the soundness of theistic arguments, the best judge will be the most intelligent and scrupulous philosopher who is also disinterested in the soundness of the theistic argument under consideration. I argue that, in this case, the disinterestedness requirement is best satisfied by the theist whose belief in God is “properly basic”, and in the course of defending this argument I uncover a little-recognized desideratum for theistic arguments.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
What is the "Subaltern" of the Comparative Philosophy of Religion?Purusottama Bilimoria - 2003 - Philosophy East and West 53 (3):340-366.
Perspectives and Positions in Contemporary Analytic Philosophy of Religion.Klaas J. Kraay - 2014 - Toronto Journal of Theology 30:132-140.
Similar books and articles
God and Evidence: Problems for Theistic Philosophers.Rob Lovering - 2013 - Bloomsbury Academic.
Robert Adams's Theistic Argument From the Nature of Morality.Stephen J. Sullivan - 1993 - Journal of Religious Ethics 21 (2):303 - 312.
Philosophy of Religion: Thinking About Faith.C. Stephen Evans & R. Zachary Manis - 2009 - Ivp Academic.
Rationality and Theistic Belief: An Essay on Reformed Epistemology.Mark S. McLeod - 1993 - Cornell University Press.
Is Theistic Experience Phenomenologically Possible?Kevin Corcoran - 1996 - Religious Studies 32 (4):449 - 461.
Moral Arguments for Theistic Belief.Robert Merrihew Adams - 1979 - In C. F. Delaney (ed.), Rationality and Religious Belief. University of Notre Dame Press.
The Problem of Natural Evil I: General Theistic Replies.Luke Gelinas - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (3):533-559.
Theism in Historical Perspective.Timothy Chappell - 2011 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (1):123 - 138.