An Open Letter to Institutional Review Boards Considering Northfield Laboratories’ PolyHeme® Trial

American Journal of Bioethics 10 (10):5-8 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

At the time of this writing, a widely publicized, waived-consent trial is underway. Sponsored by Northfield Laboratories, Inc. (Evanston, IL) the trial is intended to evaluate the emergency use of PolyHeme®, an oxygen-carrying resuscitative fluid that might prevent deaths from uncontrolled bleeding. The protocol allows patients in hemorrhagic shock to be randomized between PolyHeme® and saline in the field and, still without consent, randomized between PolyHeme® and blood after arrival at an emergency department. The Federal regulations that govern the waiver of consent restrict its applicability to circumstances where proven, satisfactory treatments are unavailable. Blood—the standard treatment for hemorrhagic shock—is not available in ambulances but is available in hospitals. The authors argue that the in-hospital stage of the study fails to meet ethical and regulatory standards.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Letter to the Editor: In Defense of the PolyHeme® Trial.Anne Hamilton Dougherty - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (5):W35-W37.
The institutionalization of Open Source.Robert A. Gehring - 2006 - Poiesis and Praxis 4 (1):54-73.
Country Institutional Context as an Antecedent of Female Board Representation: An Empirical Study.Johanne Grosvold & Stephen Brammer - 2008 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 19:395-408.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-10-14

Downloads
35 (#441,839)

6 months
13 (#181,228)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references