Still an Error: Relational Theories of Art

British Journal of Aesthetics 56 (2):187-189 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Aaron Meskin and Simon Fokt have recently taken issue with our 2012 paper, ‘Relational Theories of Art: the History of an Error’. Here we respond to their objections.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Errors in ‘The History of an Error’.Simon Fokt & Aaron Meskin - 2016 - British Journal of Aesthetics 56 (2):179-185.
Relational Theories of Art: the History of an Error.A. Neill & A. Ridley - 2012 - British Journal of Aesthetics 52 (2):141-151.
In defence of error theory.Chris Daly & David Liggins - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 149 (2):209-230.
On Believing the Error Theory.Alexander Hyun & Eric Sampson - 2014 - Journal of Philosophy 111 (11):631-640.
Rule Following, Error Theory and Eliminativism.Alexander Miller - 2015 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 23 (3):323-336.
The Error In 'The Error In The Error Theory'.Richard Joyce - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):519-534.
Error and the Will.J. L. Evans - 1963 - Philosophy 38 (144):136 - 148.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-08-20

Downloads
29 (#518,760)

6 months
7 (#339,156)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Aaron Ridley
University of Southampton
Alex Neill
University of Southampton

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references