Rites of Privacy and the Privacy Trade: On the Limits of Protection for the Self

Mcgill-Queen's University Press (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Rites of Privacy and the Privacy Trade Neill constructs an original theory of natural rights and human dignity to ground our right to privacy, arguing that privacy and autonomy are innate natural properties metaphorically represented on the moral level and socially bestowed. She develops her position by drawing on works in history, sociology, metaphor, law, and the moral psychology of Lawrence Kohlberg. The resulting theory provides surprising answers to controversial and pressing questions regarding, for instance, our right to privacy for medical records in various contexts and in relation to various authority structures, including government. Neill demonstrates that, while we have some entitlement to protection of privacy, entitlement does not have the moral scope suggested by currently entrenched legal and social norms. She cautions against some of the privacy privileges we currently enjoy - referring specifically to claims such as those against insurance companies to prevent access to medical records - and suggests that if they are to be continued, respect for privacy is not the reason.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

An Intrusion Theory of Privacy.George E. Panichas - 2014 - Res Publica 20 (2):145-161.
The moral value of informational privacy in cyberspace.Diane P. Michelfelder - 2001 - Ethics and Information Technology 3 (2):129-135.
Does privacy undermine community.Mark Tunick - 2001 - Journal of Value Inquiry 35 (4):517-534.
Four challenges for a theory of informational privacy.Luciano Floridi - 2006 - Ethics and Information Technology 8 (3):109–119.
Is there a right to privacy?Steven Davis - 2009 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (4):450-475.
Privacy and the Right to Privacy.H. J. McCloskey - 1980 - Philosophy 55 (211):17 - 38.
Privacy, Intimacy, and Isolation.Julie C. Inness - 1992 - New York, US: OUP Usa.
The Right to Privacy.Lloyd L. Weinreb - 2000 - Social Philosophy and Policy 17 (2):25.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-08-22

Downloads
15 (#919,495)

6 months
6 (#522,885)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Harm, Consent and the Limits of Privacy.Matthew Weait - 2005 - Feminist Legal Studies 13 (1):97-122.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references