16. A preliminary agenda for the psychology of science

, , , &
In Barry Gholson (ed.), Psychology of Science: Contributions to Metascience. Cambridge University Press (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

William R. Shadish, Jr., Arthur C. Houts, Barry Gholson, and Robert A. Neimeyer.Barry Gholson - 1989 - In Psychology of Science: Contributions to Metascience. Cambridge University Press. pp. 1.
Cognition in the psychology of science.Barry Gholson, Eric G. Freedman & Arthur C. Houts - 1989 - In Psychology of Science: Contributions to Metascience. Cambridge University Press. pp. 267.
The psychology of science: An introduction.W. R. Shadish, A. C. Houts, B. Gholson & R. A. Neimeyer - 1989 - In Barry Gholson (ed.), Psychology of Science: Contributions to Metascience. Cambridge University Press.
Toward a cognitive psychology of science.Barry Gholson & Arthur Houts - 1989 - Social Epistemology 3 (2):107 – 127.
Psychology of science: contributions to metascience.Barry Gholson (ed.) - 1989 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Contributions of psychology to an integrative science studies.William R. Shadish, Jr & Robert A. Neimeyer - 1989 - In Steve Fuller (ed.), The Cognitive Turn: Sociological and Psychological Perspectives on Science. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Brownian notions: One historicist philosopher's resistance to psychology of science via three truisms and ecological validity.Arthur Houts & Barry Gholson - 1989 - Social Epistemology 3 (2):139 – 146.
Education, the Interpretive Agenda of Science, and the Obligation of Scientists to Promote this Agenda.Warwick Fox - 1995 - Environmental Values 4 (2):109-114.
Social factors in the psychology of science.Robert A. Neimeyer & Jeffrey S. Herman - 1989 - In Barry Gholson (ed.), Psychology of Science: Contributions to Metascience. Cambridge University Press. pp. 367.
Historical issues in the psychology of science.William R. Shadish Jr - 1989 - In Barry Gholson (ed.), Psychology of Science: Contributions to Metascience. Cambridge University Press.
The case for a psychology of science.William R. Shadish Jr - 1989 - In Barry Gholson (ed.), Psychology of Science: Contributions to Metascience. Cambridge University Press.
Review of William R. Shadish & Steve Fuller (Eds) The Social Psychology of Science. [REVIEW]J. Angelo Corlett - 1995 - Philosophical Psychology 8:199-199.
Agenda Power in the Japanese House of Representatives.Gary W. Cox, Mikitaka Masuyama & Mathew D. McCubbins - 2000 - Japanese Journal of Political Science 1 (1):1-21.
15. The perception and evaluation of quality in science.William R. Shadish Jr - 1989 - In Barry Gholson (ed.), Psychology of Science: Contributions to Metascience. Cambridge University Press.
The Political Economy of Technoscience: An Emerging Research Agenda.Kean Birch - 2013 - Spontaneous Generations 7 (1):49-61.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-31

Downloads
10 (#1,168,820)

6 months
4 (#800,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Research on research evaluation.Sven Hemlin - 1996 - Social Epistemology 10 (2):209 – 250.
Science evaluation: A glossary of possible contents.William Shadish - 1989 - Social Epistemology 3 (3):189 – 204.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references