Ethics 127 (4):896-911 (2017)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
How should we choose between uncertain prospects in which different possible people
might exist at different levels of wellbeing? Alex Voorhoeve and Marc Fleurbaey offer
an egalitarian answer to this question. I give some reasons to reject their answer and
then sketch an alternative, which I call person-affecting prioritarianism.
|
Keywords | prioritarianism egalitarianism nonidentity problem risk |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Reprint years | 2017 |
DOI | 10.1086/691568 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
View all 23 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
The impossibility of a satisfactory population prospect axiology (independently of Finite Fine-Grainedness).Elliott Thornley - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 178 (11):3671-3695.
Prioritarianism: A Response to Critics.Matthew D. Adler & Nils Holtug - 2019 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 18 (2):101-144.
Calibration Dilemmas in the Ethics of Distribution.Jacob M. Nebel & H. Orri Stefánsson - forthcoming - Economics and Philosophy:1-32.
View all 6 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Priority or Equality for Possible People?Alex Voorhoeve & Marc Fleurbaey - 2016 - Ethics 126 (4):929-954.
Introduction to the Symposium on Equality Versus Priority.Alex Voorhoeve - 2015 - Economics and Philosophy 31 (2):201-202.
Equality Versus Priority.Michael Otsuka & Alex Voorhoeve - 2018 - In Serena Olsaretti (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Distributive Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 65-85.
Equality, Priority and Person-Affecting Value.Ingmar Persson - 2001 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 4 (1):23-39.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2017-03-02
Total views
2,856 ( #1,301 of 2,499,690 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
83 ( #9,035 of 2,499,690 )
2017-03-02
Total views
2,856 ( #1,301 of 2,499,690 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
83 ( #9,035 of 2,499,690 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads