Ethics Without Numbers
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (forthcoming)
Abstract
This paper develops and explores a new framework for theorizing about the measurement and aggregation of well-being. It is a qualitative variation on the framework of social welfare functionals developed by Amartya Sen. In Sen’s framework, a social or overall betterness ordering is assigned to each profile of real-valued utility functions. In the qualitative framework developed here, numerical utilities are replaced by the properties they are supposed to represent. This makes it possible to characterize the measurability and interpersonal comparability of well-being directly, without the use of invariance conditions, and to distinguish between real changes in well-being and merely representational changes in the unit of measurement. The qualitative framework is shown to have important implications for a range of issues in axiology and social choice theory, including the characterization of welfarism, axiomatic derivations of utilitarianism, the meaningfulness of prioritarianism, the informational requirements of variable-population ethics, the impossibility theorems of Arrow and others, and the metaphysics of value.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Linear Aggregation of SSB Utility Functionals.Arja H. Turunen-Red & John A. Weymark - 1999 - Theory and Decision 46 (3):281-294.
Machian Comparativism about Mass.Niels C. M. Martens - 2022 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 73 (2):325-349.
Invariant multiattribute utility functions.Ali E. Abbas - 2010 - Theory and Decision 68 (1-2):69-99.
On the existence of altruistic value and utility functions.Jay Simon - 2016 - Theory and Decision 81 (3):371-391.
‘Ramseyfying’ Probabilistic Comparativism.Edward Elliott - 2020 - Philosophy of Science 87 (4):727-754.
Some subrecursive versions of Grzegorczyk's Uniformity Theorem.Dimiter Skordev - 2004 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 50 (45):520-524.
Utility theory and ethics.Mongin Philippe & D'Aspremont Claude - 1998 - In Salvador Barbera, Paul Hammond & Christian Seidl (eds.), Handbook of Utility Theory Volume1: Principles. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 371-481.
Against Comparativism about Mass in Newtonian Gravity - a Case Study in the Metaphysics of Scale.Niels C. M. Martens - 2017 - Dissertation, University of Oxford
The hereditary partial effective functionals and recursion theory in higher types.G. Longo & E. Moggi - 1984 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (4):1319-1332.
The Domain and Interpretation of Utility Functions: An Exploration.Marc le Menestrel & Luk van Wassenhove - 2001 - Theory and Decision 51 (2/4):329-349.
Computability of Real Numbers by Using a Given Class of Functions in the Set of the Natural Numbers.Dimiter Skordev - 2002 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 48 (S1):91-106.
Analytics
Added to PP
2021-08-28
Downloads
1,678 (#3,351)
6 months
645 (#473)
2021-08-28
Downloads
1,678 (#3,351)
6 months
645 (#473)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
References found in this work
Theory of Games and Economic Behavior.John Von Neumann & Oskar Morgenstern - 1944 - Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
The Tools of Metaphysics and the Metaphysics of Science.Theodore Sider - 2020 - Oxford, England and New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.
Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey.Robert Duncan Luce & Howard Raiffa - 1957 - New York: Wiley.