The Philosophical Significance of Gödel’s Slingshot

Mind 104 (416):761-825 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/mind/104.416.761

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

One way to face facts.Greg Restall - 2004 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (216):420–426.
The Philosophical Insignificance of Gödel's Slingshot.G. Oppy - 1997 - Mind 106 (421):121-142.
Stephen Neale, Facing Facts, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001, xv + 254 pp. [REVIEW]Jaroslav Peregrin - unknown
The Slingshot Argument, Gödel's Hesitation and Tarskian Semantics.Arhat Virdi - 2009 - Prolegomena 8 (1):233-241.
On the paradoxical time-structures of gödel.Howard Stein - 1970 - Philosophy of Science 37 (4):589-601.
Slingshot arguments: two versions.Rafal Urbaniak - 2009 - The Reasoner 3.
Facing Facts. [REVIEW]John MacFarlane - 2002 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 200208.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
164 (#113,653)

6 months
8 (#352,434)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephen Neale
CUNY Graduate Center

Citations of this work

Why do informal proofs conform to formal norms?Jody Azzouni - 2009 - Foundations of Science 14 (1-2):9-26.
The presidential address: Truth: The identity theory.Jennifer Hornsby - 1997 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 97 (1):1–24.
Names.Sam Cumming - 2009 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 30 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references