The capacity to designate a surrogate is distinct from decisional capacity: normative and empirical considerations

Journal of Medical Ethics 48 (3):189-192 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The capacity to designate a surrogate is not simply another kind of medical decision-making capacity. A patient with DMC can express a preference, understand information relevant to that choice, appreciate the significance of that information for their clinical condition, and reason about their choice in light of their goals and values. In contrast, a patient can possess the CDS even if they cannot appreciate their condition or reason about the relative risks and benefits of their options. Patients who lack DMC for many or most kinds of medical choices may nonetheless possess the CDS, particularly since the complex means-ends reasoning required by DMC is one of the first capacities to be lost in progressive cognitive diseases. That is, patients with significant cognitive decline or mental illness may still understand what a surrogate does, express a preference about a potential surrogate, and be able to provide some kind of justification for that selection. Moreover, there are many legitimate and relevant rationales for surrogate selection that are inconsistent with the reasoning criterion of DMC. Unfortunately, many patients are prevented from designating a surrogate if they are judged to lack DMC. When such patients possess the CDS, this practice is ethically wrong, legally dubious and imposes avoidable burdens on healthcare institutions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Medical Surrogate as Fiduciary Agent.Dana Howard - 2017 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 45 (3):402-420.
A Mixed Judgment Standard for Surrogate Decision-Making.Nathan Stout - 2022 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 47 (4):540-548.
Commentary.Paul B. Hofmann - 2004 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (1):96-97.
Patient Confidentiality and the Surrogate's Right to Know.Lynn A. Jansen & Lainie Friedman Ross - 2000 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (2):137-143.
Patient Confidentiality and the Surrogate's Right to Know.Lynn A. Jansen & Lainie Friedman Ross - 2000 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (2):137-143.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-02-20

Downloads
32 (#429,411)

6 months
7 (#174,778)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Mark Christopher Navin
Oakland University
Tom Tomlinson
Michigan State University
Jason Adam Wasserman
Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine