- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
An epistemic logic of blameworthiness
Artificial Intelligence 283 (C):103269 (2020)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Epistemic responsibility.J. Angelo Corlett - 2008 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (2):179 – 200.
Nikolaj Nottelmann: Blameworthy Belief. A Study in Epistemic Deontologism: Synthese Library, Vol. 338, Springer, Dordrecht 2007, XII, 268 pp., Hardback, 160,49 €, ISBN: 978-1-4020-5960-5.Andrea Kruse - 2015 - Erkenntnis 80 (3):675-680.
Frankfurt-pairs and varieties of blameworthiness: Epistemic morals. [REVIEW]Ishtiyaque Haji - 1997 - Erkenntnis 47 (3):351-377.
Blame Transfer.Jan Willem Wieland & Philip Robichaud - forthcoming - In Philip Robichaud & Jan Willem Wieland (eds.), Responsibility - The Epistemic Condition. Oxford University Press.
Dynamic Epistemic Logic.Hans van Ditmarsch, and, Wiebe van der Hoek & Barteld Kooi - 2016 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Dynamic Epistemic Logic.Hans van Ditmarsch, Wiebe van der Hoek & Barteld Kooi - 2016 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Desert, Control, and Moral Responsibility.Douglas W. Portmore - 2019 - Acta Analytica 34 (4):407-426.
Is Blameworthiness Forever?Andrew C. Khoury & Benjamin Matheson - 2018 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 4 (2):204-224.
Together we know how to achieve: An epistemic logic of know-how.Pavel Naumov & Jia Tao - 2018 - Artificial Intelligence 262 (C):279-300.
Everyone knows that someone knows: Quantifiers over epistemic agents.Pavel Naumov & Jia Tao - 2019 - Review of Symbolic Logic 12 (2):255-270.
What do We Want from a Theory of Epistemic Blame?Adam Piovarchy - 2021 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 99 (4):791-805.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-12-22
Downloads
23 (#666,649)
6 months
13 (#184,769)
2020-12-22
Downloads
23 (#666,649)
6 months
13 (#184,769)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Responsibility of AI Systems.Mehdi Dastani & Vahid Yazdanpanah - 2023 - AI and Society 38 (2):843-852.
Data-informed knowledge and strategies.Junli Jiang & Pavel Naumov - 2022 - Artificial Intelligence 309 (C):103727.
Reasoning about responsibility in autonomous systems: challenges and opportunities.Vahid Yazdanpanah, Enrico H. Gerding, Sebastian Stein, Mehdi Dastani, Catholijn M. Jonker, Timothy J. Norman & Sarvapali D. Ramchurn - 2023 - AI and Society 38 (4):1453-1464.
Counterfactual and seeing-to-it responsibilities in strategic games.Pavel Naumov & Jia Tao - 2023 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 174 (10):103353.
References found in this work
Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility.Harry G. Frankfurt - 1969 - Journal of Philosophy 66 (23):829-839.
Moral responsibility and determinism: The cognitive science of folk intuitions.Shaun Nichols & Joshua Knobe - 2007 - Noûs 41 (4):663–685.
Together we know how to achieve: An epistemic logic of know-how.Pavel Naumov & Jia Tao - 2018 - Artificial Intelligence 262 (C):279-300.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-pp8v9 uwo