Ethics and International Affairs 19 (2):21–26 (2005)

Tesón's “humanitarian rationales” for the war in Iraq strain the traditional understanding of humanitarian intervention: The first, that the war was fought to overthrow a tyrant. The second, that it was a defense strategy establishing democratic regimes peacefully, but by force if necessary
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1747-7093.2005.tb00497.x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Ending Tyranny in Iraq.Fernando R. Tesón - 2005 - Ethics and International Affairs 19 (2):1-20.
Liberal Empire: Assessing the Arguments.Jedediah Purdy - 2003 - Ethics and International Affairs 17 (2):35–47.
Preserving the Imbalance of Power.David C. Hendrickson - 2003 - Ethics and International Affairs 17 (1):157-162.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Implications of Drones on the Just War Tradition.Daniel Brunstetter & Megan Braun - 2011 - Ethics and International Affairs 25 (3):337-358.
Of Tyrants and Empires: Reply to Terry Nardin.Fernando R. Tesón - 2005 - Ethics and International Affairs 19 (2):27-30.
Can the Doctrine of Just Military Intervention Survive Iraq?Daryl Glaser - 2010 - Journal of Global Ethics 6 (3):287-304.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
585 ( #14,621 of 2,519,324 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
62 ( #12,847 of 2,519,324 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes