Egalitarianism: Partial, counterproductive, and baseless

Ratio 10 (3):280–295 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Egalitarians hold that some good things should, in principle, be distributed equally among all people. Which good things? Why just those and not others? Why are they to be equalized only among humans and not, say, between humans and cats? And why is the equalization to be confined within the borders of the author's State, rather than practiced over the whole human race (at least)? Those are all matters for the particular egalitarian to explain, as best he can. None, I think, can be explained satisfactorily, but we cannot press such matters in the present short..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
92 (#182,422)

6 months
13 (#182,749)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jan Narveson
University of Waterloo

Citations of this work

Defending equality of outcome.Anne Phillips - 2004 - Journal of Political Philosophy 12 (1):1–19.
Time discounting, consistency, and special obligations: a defence of Robust Temporalism.Harry R. Lloyd - 2021 - Global Priorities Institute, Working Papers 2021 (11):1-38.
Equality in Law and Philosophy.William E. O'Brian - 2010 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 53 (3):257-284.
Introduction to the special issue on philosophical foundations of artificial intelligence.Varol Akman - 2000 - Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 12 (3):247-250.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references