What did Popper learn from Lakatos?

British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25 (6):1202-1215 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The canonical version of the history of twentieth century philosophy of science tells us that Lakatos was Popper’s disciple, but it is rarely mentioned that Popper would have learned anything from Lakatos. The aim of this paper is to examine Lakatos’ influence on Popper’s philosophical system and to argue that Lakatos did have an important, yet somewhat unexpected, impact on Popper’s thinking: he influenced Popper’s evolutionary model for ‘progress’ in science. And Lakatos’ influence sheds new light on why and how Popper continually revised one of the central claims of his philosophy of science: the evolutionary account of scientific theory change.

Similar books and articles

Lakatos' modification of Popper's falsificationism.Mo Liu - 2005 - Dissertation, University of Edinburgh
Lakatos, Reason, and Rationality.Gabor Forrai - 2002 - In G. Kampis L. Kvasz & M. Stöltzner (eds.), Appraising Lakatos: Mathematics, Methodology, and the Man. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 73-83.
Popper's Darwinian analogy.Bence Nanay - 2011 - Perspectives on Science 19 (3):337-354.
The 'Popperian Programme' and mathematics.Eduard Glas - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (1):119-137.
The ‘popperian Programme’ And Mathematics: Part I: the fallibilist logic of mathematical discovery.Eduard Glas - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (1):119-137.
Lakatos' Criticisms of Popper.Donald Gillies - 2002 - In George Kampis, Ladislav Kvasz & Michael Stöltzner (eds.), Appraising Lakatos: Mathematics, Methodology and the Man. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 13-22.
The propositional content of the Popper-Lakatos rift.John Watkins - 2002 - In G. Kampis, L.: Kvasz & M. Stöltzner (eds.), Appraising Lakatos: Mathematics, Methodology and the Man. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 3--12.
A critique of Popper's views on scientific method.Nicholas Maxwell - 1972 - Philosophy of Science 39 (2):131-152.
The propositional content of the Popper-Lakatos rift.G. Kampis, L. Kvasz & M. Stoltzner - 2002 - In G. Kampis, L.: Kvasz & M. Stöltzner (eds.), Appraising Lakatos: Mathematics, Methodology and the Man. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 1--3.
Tudományfilozófiai írásai.Imre Lakatos, Gâabor Forrai & Tamâas Miklâos - 1997 - Budapest: Atlantisz. Edited by Gábor Forrai & Tamás Miklós.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-03-31

Downloads
537 (#32,552)

6 months
152 (#19,892)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bence Nanay
University of Antwerp

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.David Bohm - 1964 - Philosophical Quarterly 14 (57):377-379.
Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes.Imre Lakatos - 1970 - In Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press. pp. 91-196.
Conjectures and Refutations.Karl Popper - 1963 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 19 (2):159-168.
The propensity interpretation of fitness.Susan K. Mills & John H. Beatty - 1979 - Philosophy of Science 46 (2):263-286.
Natural selection and the emergence of mind.Karl Popper - 1978 - Dialectica 32 (3‐4):339-55.

View all 22 references / Add more references