Poverty: Deprivation in Basic Capabilities

Dissertation, Bowling Green State University (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The way poverty is understood has substantive implications for how it is analyzed, and measured, and for the kinds of policies formulated to address it. There are two dominant ways of understanding poverty: either as a lack of a certain level of income or as a deprivation in basic human needs. This dissertation examines these two conceptions and finds them wanting as a basis or framework for addressing the problem of poverty. This dissertation then proposes and argues for an alternative conception of poverty: as deprivation or failure in basic capabilities to function in elementary human ways. This conception of poverty is based primarily on Amartya Sen's notion of functionings and capabilities. ;The fundamental failure of the economic conception of poverty is that it does not capture the multidimensional character of poverty. It focuses on one part of the phenomenon and mistakes it for the whole. It sees poverty as primarily the lack of a particular level of income and employs only income and money-metric indicators to identify and measure the phenomenon. This approach can only tell us about income-deprivation and it can only result in policies that are limited, narrow and at times, irrelevant. ;The basic needs approach, on the other hand, is a richer basis for analyzing poverty, for understanding its causes and the situation of the poor, and for formulating policies that aim to alleviate poverty. However, this conception of poverty lacks the theoretical resources for making normative conclusions based on the idea of basic human needs, and as a result, it encounters some difficulties at the level of practice. ;This dissertation gives a two-pronged argument in defense of the basic capabilities conception of poverty. First, the understanding of poverty as deprivation in basic capabilities avoids the conceptual and practical shortcomings of the above two approaches. Second, it is a conception of poverty that can explain and justify why poverty is a bad thing and why we have obligations, based on justice, to alleviate and prevent poverty, not only towards the poor who live within our own political borders but towards all the impoverished people in the world

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What is Poverty?Peter Higgins, Audra King & April Shaw - 2008 - In Rebecca Whisnant & Peggy DesAutels (eds.), Global Feminist Ethics: Feminist Ethics and Social Theory. Rowman & Littlefield.
Poverty and Poverty Alleviation.Scott Wisor - 2012 - In M. Juergensmeyer & H. K. Anheier (eds.), Encyclopedia of Global Studies. Sage Publications.
Poverty and Freedom.Gottfried Schweiger & Gunter Graf - 2014 - Human Affairs 24 (2):258-268.
Philosophie und Armut. Überlegungen zu ihrem Zusammenhang.Gottfried Schweiger - 2012 - Diskurs. Gesellschafts- Und Geisteswissenschaftliche Interventionen 8 (1):66--87.
Zwei Formen der Entwürdigung: Absolute und relative Armut.Christian Neuhäuser - 2010 - Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 96 (4):542-556.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-02

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references