The Second Half of the Transcendental Deduction in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason (B)

Ideas Y Valores 58 (139):5–20 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Transcendental Deduction in the second edition of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason is divided in two parts. Nevertheless, the role of the second half is not immediately clear. This article intends to examine the argument presented in the second half after clarifying its purpose. Based on this approach, we sustain an interpretation according to which Kant tries to establish the validity of categories for all intuition given through sensibility. This interpretation seeks to confirm a conceptual articulation among sensible intuitions that is not regarded as a result of objective judgment.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The First Half of the Trascendental Deduction in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason (B).Hirotaka Nakano - 2008 - Ideas Y Valores 57 (137):93–111.
Kant’s Deduction and Apperception: Explaining the Categories.Dennis Schulting - 2012 - London and Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Science and the Synthetic Method of the Critique of Pure Reason.Melissa McBay Merritt - 2006 - Review of Metaphysics 59 (3):517-539.
Kant’s Deduction From Apperception: An Essay on the Transcendental Deduction of the Categories.Dennis Schulting - 2019 - Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.
Is Kant’s transcendental deduction of the categories fit for purpose?Anil Gomes - 2010 - Kantian Review 15 (2):118-137.
Kant’s Non-Conceptualism, Rogue Objects, and The Gap in the B Deduction.Robert Hanna - 2011 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (3):399 - 415.
¿Dónde está la deducción objetiva de Kant?Gregg Osborne - 2007 - Areté. Revista de Filosofía 19 (1):87-118.
The Critique of Pure Reason and Analytic Philosophy.Kenneth R. Westphal - 2010 - In Paul Guyer (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press.
Bausteine zur Entstehungsgeschichte der Kritik der reinen Vernunft Kants.Giovanni B. Sala - 1987 - Kant Studien 78 (1-4):153-169.
Kant’s Transcendental Deduction as a Regressive Argument.Karl Ameriks - 1978 - Kant Studien 69 (1-4):273-287.
The deduction of categories: the metaphysical and transcendental deductions.Paul Guyer - 2010 - In The Cambridge Companion to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press.
Necessity and possibility: The logical strategy of Kant's critique of pure reason (review).Philip Dwyer - 2010 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (3):402-403.
Kant's Metaphysics of the Self.Colin Marshall - 2010 - Philosophers' Imprint 10:1-21.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-13

Downloads
37 (#419,437)

6 months
12 (#203,353)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The B‐Deduction and the Refutation of Idealism.Manfred Baum - 1987 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (S1):89-107.
Der Argumentationsgang in Kants Deduktion der Kategorien.H. Wagner - 1980 - Société Française de Philosophie, Bulletin 71 (3):352.
The b-deduction and the refutation of idealism.Manfred Baum - 1987 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (S1):89-107.
Die Struktur der Deduktion bei Kant.V. Nowotny - 1981 - Société Française de Philosophie, Bulletin 72 (3):270.

Add more references