On Implicational Intermediate Logics Axiomatizable by Formulas Minimal in Classical Logic: A Counter-Example to the Komori–Kashima Problem

Studia Logica 109 (6):1413-1422 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Komori–Kashima problem, that asks whether the implicational intermediate logics axiomatizable by formulas minimal in classical logic are only intuitionistic logic and classical logic, has stood for over a decade. In this paper, we give a counter-example to this problem. Additionally, we also give some open problems derived from this result.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Uniqueness of normal proofs in implicational intuitionistic logic.Takahito Aoto - 1999 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 8 (2):217-242.
On the rules of intermediate logics.Rosalie Iemhoff - 2006 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 45 (5):581-599.
Stable Formulas in Intuitionistic Logic.Nick Bezhanishvili & Dick de Jongh - 2018 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 59 (3):307-324.
Implicational f-structures and implicational relevance logics.A. Avron - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (2):788-802.
Implicational F-Structures and Implicational Relevance Logics.A. Avron - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (2):788-802.
BCI-algebras from the point of view of logic.Jacek K. Kabzinski - 1983 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 12 (3):126-128.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-06-12

Downloads
33 (#470,805)

6 months
15 (#159,278)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?