Legal and Social Implications of Predictive Brain Machine Interfaces: Duty of Care, Negligence, and Criminal Responsibility

American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 6 (4):40-42 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Responsibility in Negligence: Why the Duty of Care is Not a Duty “To Try”.Ori J. Herstein - 2010 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 23 (2):403-428.
Duties of Care—Do they Really Exist?Nicholas J. McBride - 2004 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 24 (3):417-441.
Many Duties of Care—Or A Duty of Care? Notes from the Underground.David Howarth - 2006 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26 (3):449-472.
Dimensions of Negligence in Criminal and Tort Law.Kenneth W. Simons - 2002 - Theoretical Inquiries in Law 3 (2).
The Boundaries of Negligence.Daniel More - 2003 - Theoretical Inquiries in Law 4 (1).
A Theory of Criminal Negligence.Victor Vridar Ramraj - 1998 - Dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada)
On the Function of the Law of Negligence.Andrew Robertson - 2013 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 33 (1):31-57.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-22

Downloads
10 (#1,129,009)

6 months
3 (#902,269)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

A Threat to Autonomy? The Intrusion of Predictive Brain Implants.Frederic Gilbert - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 6 (4):4-11.

Add more references