The Deontoutilitarianist Manifesto

Ethic@ - An International Journal for Moral Philosophy 12 (2):169–192 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to propose a set of 11 moral rules that are based on a combination of Kant´s categorical imperative, Mill´s Greatest Happiness and Mill´s Principle of Harm. In short the 11 rules of deontoutilitarianism are: 1) Human Beings have the duty of a) to preserve themselves and b) not attempt to destroy the lives of other human beings 2) Rule 1b does not apply if the human being starts an attack against other innocent beings 3) Rule 1a does not apply under extreme physical suffering 4) In exceptional circumstances, where there is conflict between 1a and 1b, it is possible to violate 1a or 1b. 5) Human beings should have plain reproductive freedom 6) Human beings should not discriminate against other human beings. 7) Human beings should never be cruel against other forms of life in the universe 8) Human beings should always protect life in the universe and never threaten other forms of life, except under certain conditions to be described 9) Human beings should not use other living beings as a food source, unless under certain conditions to be described 10) Research involving animals should always respect the 3R’s (Replace, Reduce, Refine) 11) Every human being has the right to know the truth about subjects affecting their personal lives, except when knowing the truth leads to a direct violation of rule 1. Next I apply these rules to examine the morality or immorality of behaviours such as suicide, euthanasia, animal welfare, stem cell research, selection of embryos, reproduction, population policies, immortality, enhancement, war and peace, lying and telling the truth.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Value of Humanity.L. Nandi Theunissen - 2020 - Oxford University Press.
Human Suffering as a Challenge for the Meaning of Life.Ulrich Diehl - 2009 - Existenz. An International Journal in Philosophy, Religion, Politics, and the Arts.
Life and death matters: Losing a sense of the value of human beings.Christopher Cordner - 2005 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (3):207-226.
Is There Anything Unique in the Ethics of Synthetic Biology?David Heyd - 2012 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 55 (4):581-589.
Persons, Human Beings, and Respect.Peter Baumann - 2007 - Polish Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):5-17.
Individuals and Relational Beings.P. J. Lomelino - 2007 - Social Philosophy Today 23:87-101.
Getting On in a Varied World.Chrisoula Andreou - 2006 - Social Theory and Practice 32 (1):61-73.
Kant's Treatment of Animals.Holly L. Wilson - 2011 - In Paul Pojman (ed.), Food Ethics. Wadsworth.
The Basis of Human Moral Status.S. Matthew Liao - 2010 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (2):159-179.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-22

Downloads
5 (#1,510,250)

6 months
2 (#1,232,442)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Legal Paternalism.Joel Feinberg - 1971 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 1 (1):105 - 124.
Freedom not to be free.David Archard - 1990 - Philosophical Quarterly 40 (161):453.
The Irony of the Self Harm Principle.Peter C. Dalton - 1982 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 63 (4):381-391.

View all 6 references / Add more references