The social value of reasoning in epistemic justification

Episteme 12 (2):297-308 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

When and why does it matter whether we can give an explicit justification for what we believe? This paper examines these questions in the light of recent empirical work on the social functions served by our capacity to reason, in particular, Mercier and Sperber’s argumentative theory of reasoning.

Similar books and articles

The logic of justification.Sergei Artemov - 2008 - Review of Symbolic Logic 1 (4):477-513.
Values, circumstances, and epistemic justification.Rosalind S. Simson - 1993 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 31 (3):373-391.
Justification à la mode and justification simpliciter.Jane Duran - 1994 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 24 (2):178-191.
Causal reference and epistemic justification.Jane Duran - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (2):272-279.
Why Justification Matters.Declan Smithies - 2015 - In David K. Henderson & John Greco (eds.), Epistemic Evaluation: Purposeful Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press UK. pp. 224-244.
Justification and the right to believe.Jeffrey Glick - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (240):532-544.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-24

Downloads
1,067 (#11,729)

6 months
124 (#27,889)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jennifer Nagel
University of Toronto, Mississauga

References found in this work

Knowledge and its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 64 (1):200-201.
Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory.Dan Sperber - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):57.
Must . . . stay . . . strong!Kai von Fintel & Anthony S. Gillies - 2010 - Natural Language Semantics 18 (4):351-383.
Meta-cognition in animals: A skeptical look.Peter Carruthers - 2008 - Mind and Language 23 (1):58–89.

View all 11 references / Add more references