Scientific Responsibility

Global Bioethics 17 (1):93-98 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Nowadays, special attention is given to the hazards associated with genetic engineering and new inventions in biotechnology, and in fear of severe consequences, researchers, institutions and governments are required to act responsibly. The term “responsibility” may be defined in numerous ways. The definition considered in this paper, is one we believe is in common use: “Generally speaking, a person has a special responsibility for a particular outcome if they knowingly brought it about and it would not exist if not for what they did”. This concept of moral responsibility rests on what we term the three ‘I's’: individual, intentional and informed. Responsibility is individual in the sense that it must be directed towards someone. A second requirement of moral responsibility presupposes the ability to do otherwise, i.e. it presupposes each human being as an intentional actor, capable of acting according to his/her own free will. In order for someone to be responsible for their actions, the choice between alternatives must be informed. The article focus' on these three aspects of responsibility in order to reveal how difficult it is to apply and make sense of this definition with regard to new inventions in science.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,654

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Co-responsibility for research integrity.Carl Mitcham - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2):273-290.
Science and Ethical Value.Viera Bilasová - 2013 - Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) 3 (3-4):111-116.
Responsibility in a World of Causes.Manuel Vargas - 2010 - Philosophic Exchange 40 (1):56-78.
The Moral Terrain of Science.Heather Douglas - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (S5):1-19.
A Compatibilist Theory of Legal Responsibility.Nicole A. Vincent - 2015 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 9 (3):477-498.
Live it-- responsibility.Molly Aloian - 2009 - New York: Crabtree.
Commentary.Professor Sheldon Krimsky - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (4):341-344.
A Time as the Basis of the New Paradigm of Responsibility.Marina Solodkaya - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:1011-1018.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-09

Downloads
15 (#800,440)

6 months
3 (#433,312)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Equality and Partiality.Thomas Nagel - 1991 - New York, US: OUP Usa. Edited by Louis P. Pojman & Robert Westmoreland.
Equality and Partiality.Thomas Nagel - 1993 - Philosophical Quarterly 43 (172):366-372.
Equality and Partiality.Thomas Nagel - 1991 - In Louis P. Pojman & Robert Westmoreland (eds.), Equality: Selected Readings. Oup Usa.
Consequentialism and integrity.Bernard Williams - 1988 - In Samuel Scheffler (ed.), Consequentialism and its Critics. Oxford University Press. pp. 20--50.

Add more references