Godel's Proof

New York, NY, USA: Routledge. Edited by James R. Newman (1958)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In 1931 the mathematical logician Kurt Godel published a revolutionary paper that challenged certain basic assumptions underpinning mathematics and logic. A colleague of Albert Einstein, his theorem proved that mathematics was partly based on propositions not provable within the mathematical system and had radical implications that have echoed throughout many fields. A gripping combination of science and accessibility, _Godel’s Proof_ by Nagel and Newman is for both mathematicians and the idly curious, offering those with a taste for logic and philosophy the chance to satisfy their intellectual curiosity

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Godel's Proof.S. R. Peterson - 1961 - Philosophical Quarterly 11 (45):379.
Godel's Proof.Ernest Nagel & James Roy Newman - 1958 - New York, NY, USA: Routledge. Edited by James R. Newman.
Godel's Proof.Ernest Nagel & James R. Newman - 1958 - New York, NY, USA: Routledge. Edited by James R. Newman.
Godel's Proof.Ernest Nagel & James R. Newman - 1958 - New York, NY, USA: Routledge. Edited by James R. Newman.
Interpreting Gödel: Critical Essays.Juliette Kennedy (ed.) - 2014 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Penrose's new argument.Per Lindström - 2001 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 30 (3):241-250.
Gödel's incompleteness theorems.Raymond M. Smullyan - 1992 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Lou Goble.
Review: Ernest Nagel, James R. Newman, Godel's Proof. [REVIEW]Th Skolem - 1959 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 24 (3):222-222.
Review: Ernest Nagel, James R. Newman, Godel's Proof. [REVIEW]Alonzo Church - 1956 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 21 (4):374-374.
Putnam's review of gödel's proof.Ernest Nagel & James R. Newman - 1961 - Philosophy of Science 28 (2):209-211.
The gödel paradox and Wittgenstein's reasons.Francesco Berto - 2009 - Philosophia Mathematica 17 (2):208-219.
Gödel's proof.Ernest Nagel - 1958 - [New York]: New York University Press. Edited by James Roy Newman.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-17

Downloads
8 (#1,287,956)

6 months
5 (#629,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Plato's Problem: An Introduction to Mathematical Platonism.Marco Panza & Andrea Sereni - 2013 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan. Edited by Andrea Sereni & Marco Panza.
On the philosophical relevance of Gödel's incompleteness theorems.Panu Raatikainen - 2005 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 59 (4):513-534.
Quantum hypercomputation.Tien D. Kieu - 2002 - Minds and Machines 12 (4):541-561.
Hertz and Wittgenstein's philosophy of science.Peter C. Kjaergaard - 2002 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 33 (1):121-149.

View all 28 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references