Environmental ethics and Spinoza's ethics. Comments on Genevieve Lloyd's article

Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 23 (3):313 – 325 (1980)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The sheer complexity of Spinoza's thinking makes it impossible for any movement to use him as a patron. But philosophically engaged ecologists and environmentalists may find in his system an inexhaustible source of inspiration. This holds good even if he was personally a ?speciesist? and uninterested in animals or landscapes. Underestimation of his potential help is due to a variety of factors: failure to pay enough attention to the structure of his system, belief in its close resemblance to that of Hobbes, and interpretation of ?understanding love of God? as a contemplative, general attitude incompatible with environmentalist activism and interest in every living being. The system of Spinoza is compatible with activism ? like that of Jan de Witt ? and with respect for all things as ?expressions of the power of God or Nature?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Spinoza's environmental ethics.Genevieve Lloyd - 1980 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 23 (3):293 – 311.
Recent work on Spinoza.G. H. R. Parkinson - 1997 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 5 (2):389 – 401.
Spinoza: critical assessments.Genevieve Lloyd (ed.) - 2001 - New York: Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-30

Downloads
86 (#192,516)

6 months
12 (#203,353)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement. A summary.Arne Naess - 1973 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 16 (1-4):95 – 100.
Spinoza and ecology.Arne Naess - 1977 - Philosophia 7 (1):45-54.
Self-realization in mixed communities of humans, bears, sheep, and wolves.Arne Naess - 1979 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 22 (1-4):231 – 241.

View all 7 references / Add more references