Choosing a Theodicy: The Leibniz-Malebranche-Arnauld Connection

Journal of the History of Ideas 55 (4):573-589 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/2709923

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Arnauld’s God.Steven Nadler - 2008 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (4):pp. 517-538.
Malebranche and Leibniz on the best of all possible worlds.Tad M. Schmaltz - 2010 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 48 (1):28-48.
The best of all possible worlds: a story of philosophers, God, and evil.Steven M. Nadler - 2008 - New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
The best of all possible worlds: a story of philosophers, God, and evil in the Age of Reason.Steven M. Nadler - 2008 - Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Occasionalism, Laws and General Will.Russell Wahl - 2011 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (2):219-240.
Malebranche's natural theodicy and the incompleteness of God's volitions.Andrew Pessin - 2000 - Religious Studies 36 (1):47-63.
Malebranche's Theodicy,'S. Nadler'.Donald Rutherford - 2000 - In Steven M. Nadler (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Malebranche. Cambridge University Press. pp. 165--89.
The Cambridge companion to Malebranche.Steven M. Nadler (ed.) - 2000 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Nicolas Malebranche: Freedom in an Occasionalist World.Susan Peppers-Bates - 2009 - Continuum.
Deux cartesiens: La polemique Arnauld Malebranche (review).Steven M. Nadler - 2000 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 38 (4):595-597.
Malebranche and occasionalism: A reply to Steven Nadler.Desmond M. Clarke - 1995 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 33 (3):499-504.
Leibniz and Malebranche on innate ideas.Nicholas Jolley - 1988 - Philosophical Review 97 (1):71-91.
The Malebranche–Arnauld Debate.Denis Moreau - 2000 - In Steven M. Nadler (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Malebranche. Cambridge University Press. pp. 87--111.
Intentionality in the Arnauld-Malebranche Debate.Steven Nadler - 1992 - In Phillip D. Cummins & Guenter Zoeller (eds.), Minds, Ideas, and Objects: Essays in the Theory of Representation in Modern Philosophy. Ridgeview Publishing Company.
New Essays on Leibniz’s Theodicy.Larry M. Jorgensen & Samuel Newlands (eds.) - 2014 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-28

Downloads
501 (#35,731)

6 months
5 (#629,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Steven Nadler
University of Wisconsin, Madison

Citations of this work

Leibniz Reinterpreted.Lloyd Strickland - 2006 - London, UK: Continuum.
Les mondes possibles de Malebranche et Leibniz.Louis Pijaudier-Cabot - 2023 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 120 (4):477-493.
Occasionalism, Laws and General Will.Russell Wahl - 2011 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (2):219-240.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references