What is the best age to circumcise? A medical and ethical analysis

Bioethics 34 (7):645-663 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Circumcision is often claimed to be simpler, safer and more cost-effective when performed in the neonatal period as opposed to later in life, with a greater benefit-to-risk ratio. In the first part of this paper, we critically examine the evidence base for these claims, and find that it is not as robust as is commonly assumed. In the second part, we demonstrate that, even if one simply grants these claims for the sake of argument, it still does not follow that neonatal circumcision is ethically permissible absent urgent medical necessity. Based on a careful consideration of the relevant evidence, arguments and counterarguments, we conclude that medically unnecessary penile circumcision—like other medically unnecessary genital procedures, such as ‘cosmetic’ labiaplasty—should not be performed on individuals who are too young (or otherwise unable) to provide meaningful consent to the procedure.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The ethics of infant male circumcision.Brian D. Earp - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (7):418-420.
Sex and Circumcision.Brian D. Earp - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (2):43-45.
Male circumcision: a scientific perspective.R. V. Short - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (3):241-241.
Parental consent to cosmetic facial surgery in Down's syndrome.R. B. Jones - 2000 - Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (2):101-102.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-02-19

Downloads
24 (#563,024)

6 months
6 (#202,901)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?