Factors affecting the conditioned reinforcing strength of stimuli in differential reinforcement of other behavior and fixed-time schedules

&
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 16 (1):27-30 (1980)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.3758/bf03337085

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Secondary reinforcement strength with continuous primary reinforcement: Fixed-ratio and continuous secondary reinforcement schedules.Matthew J. Swiergosz & Harvard L. Armus - 1988 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 26 (3):252-253.
Information value and stimulus configuring as factors in conditioned reinforcement.David R. Thomas, David L. Berman & George E. Serednesky - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 76 (2p1):181.
Conditioned reinforcement strength in rats as a function of CRF scheduling.Donald F. McCausland & John C. Birkmer - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 83 (1p1):177.
Effectiveness of secondary reinforcing stimuli as a function of the quantity and quality of food reinforcement.Charles Owen Hopkins - 1955 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 50 (5):339.
Generalization gradients around stimuli associated with different reinforcement schedules.Norman Guttman - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (5):335.
The effect of differential onset time on the conditioned response strength to elements of a stimulus complex.Delos D. Wickens, Robert S. Gehman & Shirley N. Sullivan - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (1):85.
Observing and conditioned reinforcement.James A. Dinsmoor - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (4):693.
Discrimination learning as a function of pretraining reinforcement schedules.Harold W. Stevenson & Leo A. Pirojnikoff - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 56 (1):41.
The generalization of conditioned responses. IV. The effects of varying amounts of reinforcement upon the degree of generalization of conditioned responses. [REVIEW]C. I. Hovland - 1937 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 21 (3):261.
Differential characteristics of conditioned eyelid responses established by reflex and voluntary reinforcement.D. G. Marquis & J. M. Porter - 1939 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 24 (4):347.
Pigeons’ preference for fixed-interval over fixed-ratio food reinforcement schedules.Robert W. Schaeffer - 1979 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 14 (3):173-176.
The acquisition and extinction of conditioned eyelid responses as a function of the percentage of fixed-ratio random reinforcement.David A. Grant & Lowell M. Schipper - 1952 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 43 (4):313.
Resistance to extinction as a function of the fixed ratio.John J. Boren - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 61 (4):304.
Effects of vasopressin on multiple fixed-ratio fixed-interval schedules of reinforcement.Steven L. Cohen, Martha Knight, Carol A. Tamminga & Thomas N. Chase - 1985 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 23 (6):531-534.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-22

Downloads
22 (#692,982)

6 months
4 (#800,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references