On Partial and Paraconsistent Logics

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 40 (3):352-374 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper we consider the theory of predicate logics in which the principle of Bivalence or the principle of Non-Contradiction or both fail. Such logics are partial or paraconsistent or both. We consider sequent calculi for these logics and prove Model Existence. For L4, the most general logic under consideration, we also prove a version of the Craig-Lyndon Interpolation Theorem. The paper shows that many techniques used for classical predicate logic generalise to partial and paraconsistent logics once the right set-up is chosen. Our logic L4 has a semantics that also underlies Belnap’s [4] and is related to the logic of bilattices. L4 is in focus most of the time, but it is also shown how results obtained for L4 can be transferred to several variants.

Similar books and articles

A Paraconsistentist Approach to Chisholm's Paradox.Marcelo Esteban Coniglio & Newton Marques Peron - 2009 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 13 (3):299-326.
Ideal Paraconsistent Logics.O. Arieli, A. Avron & A. Zamansky - 2011 - Studia Logica 99 (1-3):31-60.
Paraconsistent logics included in Lewis’ S4.Gemma Robles & José M. Méndez - 2010 - Review of Symbolic Logic 3 (3):442-466.
Paraconsistency Everywhere.Greg Restall - 2002 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 43 (3):147-156.
Yes, Virginia, there really are paraconsistent logics.Bryson Brown - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (5):489-500.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
260 (#69,181)

6 months
88 (#41,705)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Reinhard Muskens
University of Amsterdam

References found in this work

Situations and attitudes.Jon Barwise & John Perry - 1981 - Journal of Philosophy 78 (11):668-691.
Situations and Attitudes.Jon Barwise & John Perry - 1983 - Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Edited by John Perry.
A useful four-valued logic.N. D. Belnap - 1977 - In J. M. Dunn & G. Epstein (eds.), Modern Uses of Multiple-Valued Logic. D. Reidel.
Toward useful type-free theories. I.Solomon Feferman - 1984 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (1):75-111.

View all 19 references / Add more references