What Are Families For?: Getting to an Ethics of Reproductive Technology

Hastings Center Report 32 (3):41-45 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The standard approach to the ethics of reproductive technologies starts and ends with the parents’ procreative liberty. There's much more to think about. We should start with the relationship between parents and children.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2012

DOI

10.2307/3528113

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The New Kinship: Constructing Donor-Conceived Families.Naomi R. Cahn - 2012 - New York University Press.
Beyond choice: reproductive freedom in the 21st century.Alexander Sanger - 2004 - New York: Public Affairs.
The Best Interest of Children and the Basis of Family Policy: The Issue of Reproductive Caring Units.Christian Munthe & Thomas Hartvigsson - 2012 - In Daniela Cutas & Sarah Chan (eds.), Families: Beyond the Nuclear Ideal. Bloomsbury Academic.
The patient in the family: an ethics of medicine and families.Hilde Lindemann - 1995 - New York: Routledge. Edited by James Lindemann Nelson.
Just another reproductive technology? The ethics of human reproductive cloning as an experimental medical procedure.D. Elsner - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (10):596-600.
Freedom and responsibility in reproductive choice.John R. Spencer & Antje Du Bois-Pedain (eds.) - 2006 - Portland, Or.: Hart.
The Ethical and Religious Challenges of Reproductive Technology.Richard A. Mccormick - 1999 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (4):547-556.
The wisdom of caution: Genetic enhancement and future children.Jason Borenstein - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (4):517-530.
Acceptance, avoidance, and ambiguity: Conflicting social values about childhood disability.Carol Levine - 2005 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 15 (4):371-383.
Identity, harm, and the ethics of reproductive technology.Janet Malek - 2006 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (1):83 – 95.
Unlikely Fissures and Uneasy Resonances: Lesbian Co-mothers, Surrogate Parenthood and Fathers' Rights. [REVIEW]Jenni Millbank - 2008 - Feminist Legal Studies 16 (2):141-167.
Care ethics and the global practice of commercial surrogacy.Jennifer A. Parks - 2010 - Bioethics 24 (7):333-340.
Keeping up with the cloneses -- issues in human cloning.Bernard E. Rollin - 1999 - The Journal of Ethics 3 (1):51-71.
Rethinking radical politics in the context of assisted reproductive technology.Jennifer Parks - 2008 - Bioethics 23 (1):20-27.
Reproductive choice: Screening Policy and Access to the Means of Reproduction.Lucinda Vandervort - 2006 - Human Rights Quarterly 28 (2):438-464.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
131 (#134,708)

6 months
5 (#526,961)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Acting parentally: an argument against sex selection.R. McDougall - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (10):601-605.
Parenthood and Procreation.Tim Bayne & Avery Kolers - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references