``Three Versions of Universalism"

Faith and Philosophy 16 (1):55--68 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In recent years a number of sophisticated versions of soteriological universalism have appeared in the literature. In this essay I offer some critical retlections them. In particular, I argue that universalism offers no explanation for the fact that God puts human creatures through the earthly life, and that if there is no such reason then the earthly life and the evil it contains are both gratuitous. Finally, I argue that universalists are obliged to deny that human beings have a centrally important feature of human freedom.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Three Versions of Universalism.Michael J. Murray - 1999 - Faith and Philosophy 16 (1):55-68.
In Defense of Naïve Universalism.Daniel Howard-Snyder - 2003 - Faith and Philosophy 20 (3):345-363.
In defense of mereological universalism.Michael C. Rea - 1998 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58 (2):347-360.
Michael H. Mitias on Universalism.Nkeonye Otakpor - 2002 - Dialogue and Universalism 12 (1-2):111-122.
Why Universalism?Michael H. Mitias - 2003 - Dialogue and Universalism 13 (7-8):15-16.
McGrath on universalism.Michael C. Rea - 1999 - Analysis 59 (3):200–203.
Universalism and Classes.Nikk Effingham - 2011 - Dialectica 65 (3):451-472.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-11-29

Downloads
20 (#720,454)

6 months
3 (#880,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Murray
Franklin and Marshall College

References found in this work

Three Versions of Universalism.Michael J. Murray - 1999 - Faith and Philosophy 16 (1):55-68.

Add more references