Religious Studies 40 (3):335-339 (2004)

Mark Murphy
Georgetown University
Michael J. Almeida offers two criticisms of the argument of my ‘A trilemma for divine command theory’. The first criticism is that I mistakenly assume the validity of the following inference pattern: property A is identical to property B; property B supervenes on property C; therefore, property A supervenes on property C. The second criticism is that I have misinterpreted the moral-supervenience thesis upon which I rely in making this argument. The first of Almeida's criticisms is completely untenable. The second of his criticisms casts doubt on my argument, a doubt that I can mitigate but not entirely dispel. (Published Online August 11 2004).
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0034412504007097
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,008
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Divine Command Theory and Moral Supervenience.Blake McAllister - 2016 - Philosophia Christi 18 (1):65-78.
Richard Joyce's New Objections to the Divine Command Theory.Scott Hill - 2010 - Journal of Religious Ethics 38 (1):189-196.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
37 ( #306,844 of 2,505,180 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,705 of 2,505,180 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes