Political Reconciliation, the Rule of Law, and Genocide

The European Legacy 12 (7):853-865 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Political reconciliation involves the repairing of damaged political relationships. This paper considers the possibility and moral justifiability of pursuing political reconciliation in the aftermath of systematic and egregious wrongdoing, in particular genocide. The first two sections discuss what political reconciliation specifically requires. I argue that it neither entails nor necessitates forgiveness. Rather, I claim, political reconciliation should be conceptualized as the (re-)establishment of Fullerian mutual respect for the rule of law. When a society governs by law, publicly declared legal rules establish clear and practicable standards for behavior which are enforced in practice. Subjects of the law thus can form stable and reasonable predictions of how other citizens and officials will respond to their actions. After explaining why this analysis of political reconciliation is compelling, the third section spells out the implications of my analysis for determining the possibility of achieving and the justifiability of pursuing political reconciliation



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,264

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

62 (#193,767)

6 months
3 (#225,457)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Colleen Murphy
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Citations of this work

Forgiveness and Reconciliation.Barrett Emerick - 2017 - In Kathryn J. Norlock (ed.), The Moral Psychology of Forgiveness. London, UK: Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 117-134.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Lon Fuller and the moral value of the rule of law.Colleen Murphy - 2004 - Law and Philosophy 24 (3):239-262.

Add more references