A perspective for viewing the history of psychophysics

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (1):115-137 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Fechner's conception of psychophysics included both “outer psychophysics” the relation between stimulus intensity and the response reflecting sensation strength, and “inner psychophysics” the relation between neurelectric responses and sensation strength. In his own time outer psychophysics focussed on the form of the psychophysical law, with Fechner espousing a logarithmic law, Delboeuf a variant of the logarithmic law incorporating a resting level of neural activity, and Plateau a power law. One of the issues on which the dispute was focussed concerned the appearance of contrasts if the overall illumination was increased or decreased; another issue was the question of whether a sensation of a “just noticeable difference” established for one value of a sensory dimension appeared the same for a value elsewhere on the dimension. The development of “inner psychophysics” led through the works of Delboeuf, Solomons, Jastrow, and Thurstone to modern signal detection theory. A third line of research, devoted to the question of what was meant by the “measurement” of sensation strength, stemmed from the criticism of Fechner's work by von Kries (1882) and others. Although a valid body of science could be built up without the intervening variable called “sensation strength,” such a science might be a cumbersome representation of reality. When an optical contrast is set up, and its overall illumination is increased or decreased, subjective contrasts involving medium levels of lightness vary little as illumination varies (as a power law based on sensation ratios or a logarithmic law based on sensation differences predict), but subjective contrasts involving extreme levels of lightness might be subject to the effects of other variables.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What is Psychophysics?Lawrence A. Shapiro - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:47 - 57.
The Weber-Fechner law and mental measurement.F. M. Urban - 1933 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 16 (2):221.
Measurement of sensory intensity.Richard M. Warren - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (2):175-189.
Psychophysics as a science of primary experience.Jiří Wackermann - 2010 - Philosophical Psychology 23 (2):189 – 206.
Functional relations and causality in fechner and Mach.Michael Heidelberger - 2010 - Philosophical Psychology 23 (2):163 – 172.
The Measurement of Sensation: A Critique of Perceptual Psychophysics.A. R. Louch - 1972 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 10 (4):495-495.
On the psychophysics of memory.N. Cowan - 2004 - In Christian Kaernbach, Erich Schroger & Hermann Müller (eds.), Psychophysics Beyond Sensation: Laws and Invariants of Human Cognition. Psychology Press. pp. 313--317.
Gustav Theodor Fechner (1801–1887) und die Leipziger bürgerliche Gesellschaft im 19. Jahrhundert.Hans-Jürgen Arendt - 2001 - NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin 9 (1):2-14.
A perspective for viewing the present of psychophysics.Paul Whittle - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (1):165-166.
The place of psychophysics in the history of sensory science.David J. Murray - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (1):166-186.
On the problem of hysteresis in psychophysics.Hannes Eisler & Chris Ottander - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (6):530.


Added to PP

76 (#209,950)

6 months
8 (#283,518)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?