Germ-Line Gene Therapy and the Medical Imperative

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 2 (2):137-158 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Somatic cell gene therapy has yielded promising results. If germ cell gene therapy can be developed, the promise is even greater: hundreds of genetic diseases might be virtually eliminated. But some claim the procedure is morally unacceptable. We thoroughly and sympathetically examine several possible reasons for this claim but find them inadequate. There is no moral reason, then, not to develop and employ germ-line gene therapy. Taking the offensive, we argue next that medicine has a prima facie moral obligation to do so.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Germ-Line Gene Therapy Could Prove a Two-Edged Tool.A. Sutton - 2012 - Christian Bioethics 18 (2):145-155.
Genetic Disorders and the Ethical Status of Germ-Line Gene Therapy.E. M. Berger & B. M. Gert - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (6):667-683.
Should we change the human genome?Torbjörn Tännsjö - 1993 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 14 (3).
Debunking the slippery slope argument against human germ-line Gene therapy.David Resnik - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (1):23-40.
Human gene therapy and slippery slope arguments.T. McGleenan - 1995 - Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (6):350-355.
Human Gene therapy: Scientific and ethical considerations.W. French Anderson - 1985 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (3):275-292.
Human germ-line therapy: The case for its development and use.Burke K. Zimmerman - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (6):593-612.


Added to PP

168 (#115,912)

6 months
15 (#171,570)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references