Are Game Theoretic Concepts Suitable Negotiation Support Tools? From Nash Equilibrium Refinements toward a Cognitive Concept of Rationality

Theory and Decision 34 (3):235 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,479

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Methodology in Biological Game Theory.Simon M. Huttegger & Kevin J. S. Zollman - 2013 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (3):637-658.
Common Knowledge and Games with Perfect Information.Philip J. Reny - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:363 - 369.
On the Inconsistency of Equilibrium Refinement.Werner Güth - 2002 - Theory and Decision 53 (4):371-392.
Game-theoretic axioms for local rationality and bounded knowledge.Gian Aldo Antonelli & Cristina Bicchieri - 1995 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 4 (2):145-167.
Reducible and Nonsensical Uses of Game Theory.Boudewijn de Bruin - 2008 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (2):247-266.
Refinements of Nash Equilibrium: A critique.Robin Cubitt - 1989 - Theory and Decision 26 (2):107-131.
Game Theory in Philosophy.Boudewijn de Bruin - 2005 - Topoi 24 (2):197-208.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-01-22

Downloads
40 (#294,454)

6 months
1 (#455,463)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The chain store paradox.Reinhard Selten - 1978 - Theory and Decision 9 (2):127-159.
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk.D. Kahneman & A. Tversky - 1979 - Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society:263--291.

View all 15 references / Add more references