Psychology of the Informed Consent Process: A Commentary on Three Recent Articles

Ethics and Behavior 28 (7):513-516 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In conducting research on humans, respect for human dignity requires investigators to obtain informed consent. Institutional pressures, however, often reduce the informed consent form to a signature on a document. Unfortunately, people often do not read or understand these documents. In the present effort, we argue that the key problem here arises because investigators often do not take into account the psychology of participants. Based on 3 articles, we argue that informed consent requires investigators to help participants “make sense” of a study, and its implications, for both themselves and others. Informed consent procedures that might encourage participant sensemaking are discussed.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Autonomy, consent and the law.Sheila McLean - 2010 - New York, N.Y.: Routledge-Cavendish.
Consent and informational responsibility.Shaun D. Pattinson - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (3):176-179.
Informed consent: a primer for clinical practice.Deborah Bowman - 2012 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by John Spicer & Rehana Iqbal.
The Informed Consent Process in Obstetrics.Maurice James Mueller - 1996 - Dissertation, The Union Institute
Parental consent for newborn screening in southern Taiwan.M.-C. Huang - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (11):621-624.
Informed consent and routinisation.Thomas Ploug & Soren Holm - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (4):214-218.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-20

Downloads
18 (#785,610)

6 months
3 (#902,269)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?