Constructive geometrical reasoning and diagrams

Synthese 186 (1):103-119 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Modern formal accounts of the constructive nature of elementary geometry do not aim to capture the intuitive or concrete character of geometrical construction. In line with the general abstract approach of modern axiomatics, nothing is presumed of the objects that a geometric construction produces. This study explores the possibility of a formal account of geometric construction where the basic geometric objects are understood from the outset to possess certain spatial properties. The discussion is centered around Eu , a recently developed formal system of proof (presented in Mumma (Synthese 175:255–287, 2010 )) within which Euclid’s diagrammatic proofs can be represented

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-08-30

Downloads
159 (#123,910)

6 months
6 (#588,512)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Mumma
California State University, San Bernardino

References found in this work

The Euclidean Diagram.Kenneth Manders - 2008 - In Paolo Mancosu (ed.), The Philosophy of Mathematical Practice. Oxford University Press. pp. 80--133.
Proofs, pictures, and Euclid.John Mumma - 2010 - Synthese 175 (2):255 - 287.
A formal system for euclid’s elements.Jeremy Avigad, Edward Dean & John Mumma - 2009 - Review of Symbolic Logic 2 (4):700--768.

View all 16 references / Add more references