The relativity of simultaneity is not a temporal illusion

Analysis 74 (2):232-233 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this journal, Brogaard and Marlow recently argued that the relativity of simultaneity is an illusion. We claim their argument is fallacious.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Causality and temporal order in special relativity.Hanoch Ben-Yami - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (3):459-479.
Simultaneity as an Invariant Equivalence Relation.Marco Mamone-Capria - 2012 - Foundations of Physics 42 (11):1365-1383.
A New Look at Simultaneity.Kent A. Peacock - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:542 - 552.
The Sui generis conventionality of simultaneity.Laurent A. Beauregard - 1976 - Philosophy of Science 43 (4):469-490.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-25

Downloads
121 (#145,443)

6 months
9 (#290,637)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

F. A. Muller
Erasmus University Rotterdam

References found in this work

Past, present, future, and special relativity.Nataša Rakić - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (2):257-280.

Add more references